Insights
How submetering turns a multifamily building into a data-driven energy asset, and a reliable new line of NOI.
Submetering measures electricity at the unit, tenant, and equipment level. Owners get precise visibility and can buy power at a lower commercial rate through a master meter, while billing residents fairly at the standard residential rate and keeping the spread.
For large portfolios it is one of the most reliable ways to lift net operating income. Submetering typically generates around $400 per unit each year, roughly a 1% NOI increase, which can translate into double-digit asset-value appreciation at typical multifamily cap rates. Owners use the revenue to offset operating costs, fund capital improvements, and build the data foundation that every later upgrade depends on.
Submetering is only the beginning. Once it is in place, solar, EV charging, and battery storage layer onto the same platform, with the revenue reinvested into the next move.
Why imaging interruptions, generator starts, and UPS alarms usually share one root cause, and what to do about it.
Hospitals and large campuses experience events that look unrelated: imaging interruptions, unexplained generator starts, UPS alarms, and equipment that degrades early. In practice they often share one root cause, degraded power quality, originating either behind the meter or on the upstream grid.
Treated in isolation, these events drive repeated troubleshooting and equipment replacement without resolving anything. The cost is real. Northwell has observed disruption conditions that can drive losses of up to $1M per day per hospital, with ripple effects across surgical scheduling, imaging throughput, and staffing.
The fix is synchronized, campus-wide monitoring at diagnostically meaningful points, plus analytics for alerting, trending, and correlation. That moves a facility from reactive, device-by-device troubleshooting to repeatable, system-level diagnosis, and makes reactive power and voltage stability measurable instead of managed indirectly.
The emissions caps that tighten in 2030, the penalties for missing them, and how to sequence electrification without overspending.
Local Law 97, part of New York City's Climate Mobilization Act, sets carbon-emissions limits for most buildings over 25,000 square feet, covering roughly 50,000 properties across the city. Limits apply now and tighten sharply in 2030.
Buildings over the limit face penalties currently set at $268 per metric ton of CO2 equivalent above their cap, assessed every year. For many owners the question is no longer whether to electrify, but how to sequence it without overspending.
The path starts with data. Knowing exactly where energy goes makes it possible to target the moves that cut emissions and cost together, such as heat pumps, efficiency, and on-site generation, and to prove compliance instead of estimating it.
How installers, ESCOs, brokers, and advisors use DaisyChain as the layer behind their offerings.
DaisyChain works with installers, ESCOs, brokers, and energy advisors as the monitoring and monetization layer behind their offerings. Partners bring submetering, demand response, and electrification to their clients without building software.
The platform gives partners normalized, high-granularity energy data, transparent tenant billing, and a long-term system that survives tenant churn and ownership changes, so the client relationship stays with the partner.